The potential of an interdisciplinary approach in pedagogy for the development of critical thinking and creative abilities of students
How to cite
Abstract
Interdisciplinary approaches in pedagogy open up new opportunities for the development of critical thinking and creative abilities of students. This study provides a comprehensive analysis of the potential of interdisciplinarity in the context of modern education. The methodological base includes a systematic analysis, a comparative pedagogical method, and a meta-analysis of empirical data. The sample consisted of 25 study programs at leading universities in the USA and Europe, implementing an interdisciplinary approach. The results show that the integration of knowledge from different subject areas contributes to the development of students' thinking flexibility (d=0.78), creativity (d=0.84) and complex problem solving skills (d=0.72). It is revealed that the key factors for the effectiveness of interdisciplinary learning are: (1) a balanced combination of subject specialization and interdisciplinarity; (2) active involvement of students in research activities; (3) creation of a collaborative educational environment. The discussion section substantiates the value of the findings for optimizing educational programs and training new generation specialists. Prospects for further research related to the development of valid tools for evaluating the effectiveness of interdisciplinary pedagogical practices are outlined. The need for a deeper study of the mechanisms of knowledge and skills transfer between disciplines is emphasized.
Keywords
References
Boix Mansilla V., Duraisingh E.D. Targeted assessment of students' interdisciplinary work: An empirically grounded framework proposed // Journal of higher education. 2007 № 78(2). рр. 215-237.
Borrego M., Newswander L.K. Definitions of interdisciplinary research: Toward graduate-level interdisciplinary learning outcomes // Review of higher education. 2010. № 34(1). рр. 61-84.
Gooch J.C. The dynamics and challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration: A case study of «cortical depth of bench» in group proposal writing // IEEE transactions on professional communication. 2005. № 48(2). рр. 177-190.
Holley K.A. Interdisciplinary strategies as transformative change in higher education. Innovative Higher Education. 2009. № 34(5). pp. 331-344.
Ivanitskaya L., Clark D., Montgomery G., Primeau R. Interdisciplinary learning: Process and outcomes // Innovative higher education. 2002. № 27(2). рр. 95-111.
Jacobs J.A., Frickel S. Interdisciplinarity: A critical assessment // Annual review of sociology. 2009. № 35. рр. 43-65.
Klein J.T. Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research: A literature review // American journal of preventive medicine. 2008. № 35(2). рр. S116-S123.
Knight D.B., Lattuca L.R., Kimball E.W., Reason R.D. Understanding interdisciplinarity: Curricular and organizational features of undergraduate interdisciplinary programs // Innovative higher education. 2013. № 38(2). pp. 143-158.
Lattuca L.R., Knight D.B., Bergom I.M. Developing a measure of interdisciplinary competence // International journal of engineering education. 2013. № 29(3). рр. 726-739.
Newell W.H. A theory of interdisciplinary studies. Issues in integrative studies. 2001. № 19(1). рр. 1-25.
Nissani M. Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research // Social science journal. 1997. № 34(2). рр. 201-216.
Repko A.F., Szostak R. Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. NY: Sage Publications, 2016. 464 р.
Rhoten D., Pfirman S. Women in interdisciplinary science: Exploring preferences and consequences // Research рolicy. 2007. № 36(1). рр. 56-75.
Spelt E.J., Biemans H.J., Tobi H., Luning P.A., Mulder M. Teaching and learning in interdisciplinary higher education: A systematic review // Educational psychology review. 2009. № 21(4). рр. 365-378.
Szostak R. Interdisciplinary research as a creative design process // Creativity, design thinking and interdisciplinarity. Creativity in the twenty-first century. 2017. pp. 17-33.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
Metrics
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.