INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Critical thinking as a tool for developing an interdisciplinary language in modern higher education

Authors

How to cite

GOST Li X. Critical thinking as a tool for developing an interdisciplinary language in modern higher education // Education Management Review. 2026. Vol. 16. No. 6. P. 273-280. DOI: 10.25726/a9640-3047-9570-b
APA Li, X. (2026). Critical thinking as a tool for developing an interdisciplinary language in modern higher education. Education Management Review, 16(6), 273-280. https://doi.org/10.25726/a9640-3047-9570-b

Abstract

Against the backdrop of growing knowledge fragmentation in higher education, there is an urgent need to find points of intersection between various disciplines. This article attempts to substantiate the role of critical thinking not simply as a useful cognitive competence for students, but as a fundamental basis for developing a common language of academic communication. The author analyzes the methodological barriers hindering the creation of a unified epistemological space within the university. It is argued that implementing practices of critical analysis can shift disjointed pedagogical approaches towards genuine co-creation. Such a perspective allows for a fresh evaluation of the specifics of educators' professional reflection and outlines practical ways to overcome interdisciplinary disunity in the training of scientific personnel.

Keywords

Critical thinking higher education epistemological foundations interdisciplinary approach intersubjectivity educational reality pedagogical reflection

Funding

The authors did not declare any external funding for this research.

References

Baidenko V.I. Identifying the composition of university graduates' competencies as a necessary stage in designing a new generation of state higher professional education standards: methodological guide. Moscow: Research Center for Problems of the Quality of Specialist Training, 2006. 72 p.

Butenko A.V., Khodos E.A. Critical thinking: method, theory, practice. Moscow: Miros, 2002. 173 p.

Zair-Bek S.I., Mushtavinskaya I.V. Developing critical thinking in the classroom. 2nd revised ed. Moscow: Prosveshchenie, 2011. 222 p.

Lektorskii V.A. Classical and non-classical epistemology. Moscow: Editorial URSS, 2001. 256 p.

Popkov V.A., Korzhuev A.V., Ryazanova E.L. Critical thinking in the context of the tasks of higher professional education. Moscow: Moscow State University Press, 2001. 168 p.

Sorina G.V. Critical thinking: history and current status // Moscow University Bulletin. Series 7: Philosophy. 2003. № 6. pp. 98-111.

Stepin V.S. Types of scientific rationality and the synergetic paradigm // Complexity. Mind. Postnonclassic. 2013. № 4. pp. 45-59.

Tyaglo A.V., Voropay T.S. Critical Thinking: A Problem of Global Education in the 21st Century. Kharkiv: University of Internal Affairs Press, 1999. 285 p.

Habermas, J. Moral consciousness and communicative action. Trans. from German. Ed. by D.V. Sklyadnev. St. Petersburg: Science, 2000. 379 p.

Halpern D. Psychology of critical thinking. 4th inter. ed. Saint Petersburg: Peter, 2000. 503 p.

Shakirova D. M. Formation of critical thinking in school and university students: model and technology // Educational Technology and Society. 2006. Vol. 9. № 4. pp. 284-292.

Shchedrovitskii G.P. Thinking. Understanding. Reflection. Moscow: Heritage of the Moscow Methodological Circle, 2005. 460 p.

Barnett R. Higher education: A critical business. Buckingham: Open University Press, 1997. 191 p.

Ennis R.H. Critical thinking and subject specificity: clarification and needed research // Educational Researcher. 1989. Vol. 18. № 3. pp. 4-10.

Facione P. A. Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Millbrae: California Academic Press, 1990. 112 p.

Lipman M. Thinking in education. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003. 304 p.

Paul R., Elder L. Critical thinking: tools for taking charge of your professional and personal life. Upper Saddle River: Financial Times Prentice Hall, 2002. 384 p.

Star S. L., Griesemer J. R. Institutional ecology, «translations» and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39 // Social Studies of Science. 1989. Vol. 19. № 3. pp. 387-420.

Issue

Section

INTERNATIONAL EXPERIENCE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS

Metrics

0 views
0 downloads
Want to publish with us?
Submit an article